Cone beam computed tomography로 합성된 두부규격 방사선사진에서의 각 계측점의 정확도와 재현성에 관한 연구

권대근; 민승기; 전인철; 팽준영

SITE LINK

Cone beam computed tomography로 합성된 두부규격 방사선사진에서의 각 계측점의 정확도와 재현성에 관한 연구
Accuracy and reproducibility of landmark of cone beam computed tomography (CT) synthesized cephalograms

대한구강악안면외과학회지 2010년 36권 2호 p.78 ~ 86

권대근, 민승기, 전인철, 팽준영,

소속 상세정보

권대근 ( Kwon Dae-Keun ) - 원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실
민승기 ( Min Seung-Ki ) - 원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실
전인철 ( Jun In-Chul ) - 원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실
팽준영 ( Paeng Jun-Young ) - 성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 구강악안면외과

KMID : 0355620100360020078

Abstract

Introduction: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has various advantages and is used favorably in many fields in dentistry. Especially, CBCT is being used as basic diagnostic tool for 3-dimensional analysis in orthognathic patient. Two-dimensional cephalograms can be synthesized from CBCT digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) data. In this study, conventional cephalograms and CBCT were taken simultaneously, and epresentative landmarks were located and analyzed in its accuracy and reproducibility.

Materials and Methods: Ten patients who had orthognathic surgery in Wonkwang University Daejeon Dental Hospital participated in this study. For each patient, CBCT and conventional cephalogram was taken. By using Ondemand (Cybermad, Korea), 2-dimensional cephalograms was established on CBCT. In addition, 19 landmarks were designated and measured by 3 orthodontists twice a week. After these landmarks were transferred to a coordinate, distance of landmark and axis, standard error, distribution degree were measured, compared and analyzed.

Results: Comparing the CT ceph group and conventional cephalogram group, CT ceph group had shown shorter distance of landmark and axis in S, Hinge axis, Bpt, Ba, Or, Corpus left. Standard error of the mean shows that CT ceph group has better reproducibility in Or, Corpus left, Hinge axis at X axis and Na, U1R, U1T, Bpt, PNS, Ba Corpus left, Hinge axis at Y axis. In both groups, mean error was less than 1.00 mm, no significant difference were found between CT ceph group and conventional cephalogram group in all measurements. Furthermore, comparing two groups, each 17 landmarks out of 19 had its characteristic in distribution degree.

Conclusion: No significant difference were found between CBCT composed cephalographic radiograph and conventional cephalograghic radiograph, clinical application may be possible if improved.